to BixenteFabregas ... By: Moremover. on 08 Feb 12, 18:03:21 to BixenteFabregas : Compositions by Cheron? or by Jorgensen WITHOUT duals are only ANOTHER CATEGORY of worldrecords than the worldrecords WITH duals by Blathy or by my own and the #530 and #550 are ALSO basing on the DTM like the #267.
Kindly regards from Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
The mistakes you've ... By: BixenteFabregas. on 07 Feb 12, 18:51:19 The mistakes you've made
1)Basing orthodox checkmate problems on 7-pieces EGTB records without taking in consideration that the moves are not unique, THE essential condition for the correctness of a chess problem!
2)The 7-pieces EGTB (Bourzutschsky-Konoval) are DTC: distance to conversion, capture of a piece is delayed as long as possible.
The 6-pieces EGTB (Nalimov) are DTM: distance to mate, mate is delayed? as long as possible.
Read theory about correct chess problems & look at Chéron's #208!
All those are ... By: BixenteFabregas. on 07 Feb 12, 18:40:02 All those are cooked:
257 Blathy: 255.gxf6 exf6 256. Kd6 or Ke8 or Ke7 or Qc5 or e7
267 Neweklowsky: first dual: 20 Kc4 or Kd4
530 Neweklowsky: dual at least after the 6-pieces EGTB are reached! (I haven't 7's at hand!) 522...Kf8? 523.Kc6 Bf7 524.Kd6 Nc3 525.Qh6+ Kg8 526.Ng5 Ne4+ 527.Nxe4 and duals after both 527...Bd5 and 527...Bg6 with mate at 530th
550 Neweklowsky dual at least after the 6-pieces EGTB are reached 519...Rxd3 520.Kxd3 Kb8 and now 521.Kc3 or Qb2 or Qb5.
Then no record at all!
for mate in 550? by ... By: Moremover. on 04 Dec 11, 19:28:33 for mate in 550? by NEWEKLOWSKY have a look at KV 550 by MOZART
don't move until ... By: youngnam. on 31 Oct 11, 19:47:13 don't move until you? see it
You don't even? ... By: terrorlone. on 12 Aug 11, 02:35:25 You don't even? have an idea about wha't the point here, do you? We're talking about "forced mate", not idiot games you could play with your idiot friends.
no, no, sorry bro. ... By: Vince13192. on 23 Feb 11, 03:08:34 no, no, sorry bro. ur wrong.
i can just move my knights back and forth from Nc3, u move Nc6, then we rotate our knights to their orignal position. I can easily make a game with 15 trillion moves, and infinity as well.
so in all retrospect, u kinda suck, and u broke nothing. except ur? dignity. that, u ruined lol
WTF!!??? By: pepedroko. on 05 Oct 10, 13:58:44 WTF!!???
Latest comments made on this video:
By: Moremover. on 08 Feb 12, 18:03:21
to BixenteFabregas : Compositions by Cheron? or by Jorgensen WITHOUT duals are only ANOTHER CATEGORY of worldrecords than the worldrecords WITH duals by Blathy or by my own and the #530 and #550 are ALSO basing on the DTM like the #267. Kindly regards from Germany Lutz Neweklowsky
By: BixenteFabregas. on 07 Feb 12, 18:51:19
The mistakes you've made 1)Basing orthodox checkmate problems on 7-pieces EGTB records without taking in consideration that the moves are not unique, THE essential condition for the correctness of a chess problem! 2)The 7-pieces EGTB (Bourzutschsky-Konoval) are DTC: distance to conversion, capture of a piece is delayed as long as possible. The 6-pieces EGTB (Nalimov) are DTM: distance to mate, mate is delayed? as long as possible. Read theory about correct chess problems & look at Chéron's #208!
By: BixenteFabregas. on 07 Feb 12, 18:40:02
All those are cooked: 257 Blathy: 255.gxf6 exf6 256. Kd6 or Ke8 or Ke7 or Qc5 or e7 267 Neweklowsky: first dual: 20 Kc4 or Kd4 530 Neweklowsky: dual at least after the 6-pieces EGTB are reached! (I haven't 7's at hand!) 522...Kf8? 523.Kc6 Bf7 524.Kd6 Nc3 525.Qh6+ Kg8 526.Ng5 Ne4+ 527.Nxe4 and duals after both 527...Bd5 and 527...Bg6 with mate at 530th 550 Neweklowsky dual at least after the 6-pieces EGTB are reached 519...Rxd3 520.Kxd3 Kb8 and now 521.Kc3 or Qb2 or Qb5. Then no record at all!
By: Moremover. on 04 Dec 11, 19:28:33
for mate in 550? by NEWEKLOWSKY have a look at KV 550 by MOZART
By: youngnam. on 31 Oct 11, 19:47:13
don't move until you? see it
By: terrorlone. on 12 Aug 11, 02:35:25
You don't even? have an idea about wha't the point here, do you? We're talking about "forced mate", not idiot games you could play with your idiot friends.
By: Vince13192. on 23 Feb 11, 03:08:34
no, no, sorry bro. ur wrong. i can just move my knights back and forth from Nc3, u move Nc6, then we rotate our knights to their orignal position. I can easily make a game with 15 trillion moves, and infinity as well. so in all retrospect, u kinda suck, and u broke nothing. except ur? dignity. that, u ruined lol
By: pepedroko. on 05 Oct 10, 13:58:44
WTF!!???